Heightened Scrutiny Means Heightened Anxiety for Foreign Nationals
April 30, 2018 |
Immigration Blog
There is no question that immigration matters are more challenging today that in recent memory. USCIS' new culture of "no" necessitates more research, work and persistence for many filings.
Just as an FYI, below is an email I received from a colleague this week. It is not overly surprising, but it does represent some of the challenges with navigating cases these days:
“I was at USCIS yesterday for an Interview. After the interview the IO on the way out told me in confidence that a Task Force is being set up of retired IO officers whose job it will be to audit each approval of a request for benefits case/application by the active officers and to set a quota. Any active IO that is perceived to approve "too many cases" will be investigated and sanctioned. So instead of looking at the merits of each individual case that appears before them they will be judged on species quotas and numbers. The officer said to me, "these are Gestapo tactics."
I think an apt analogy is comparing immigration cases to a flight to a desired destination. I know we will get there, but the flight encounters much more turbulence today than in year’s past. Everyone feels relieved when you finally land, but that turbulence on the way, or sometimes anticipated turbulence, certainly takes a toll. There is no denying that how you get there matters, and some of the current turbulence is creating a lot of anxiety.
Just as an FYI, below is an email I received from a colleague this week. It is not overly surprising, but it does represent some of the challenges with navigating cases these days:
“I was at USCIS yesterday for an Interview. After the interview the IO on the way out told me in confidence that a Task Force is being set up of retired IO officers whose job it will be to audit each approval of a request for benefits case/application by the active officers and to set a quota. Any active IO that is perceived to approve "too many cases" will be investigated and sanctioned. So instead of looking at the merits of each individual case that appears before them they will be judged on species quotas and numbers. The officer said to me, "these are Gestapo tactics."
I think an apt analogy is comparing immigration cases to a flight to a desired destination. I know we will get there, but the flight encounters much more turbulence today than in year’s past. Everyone feels relieved when you finally land, but that turbulence on the way, or sometimes anticipated turbulence, certainly takes a toll. There is no denying that how you get there matters, and some of the current turbulence is creating a lot of anxiety.
Disclaimer: The information in this post is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect the current law in your jurisdiction. No information contained in this post should be construed as legal advice from our firm or the individual author, nor is it intended to be a substitute for legal counsel on any subject matter. No reader of this post should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any information included in, or accessible through, this post without seeking the appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue from a lawyer licensed in the recipient’s state, country or other appropriate licensing jurisdiction.
Stay Informed
Related Content
In The news
Andrew M. Wilson Quoted in SHRM Article Discussing USCIS' New Rules for the H-1B and H2 Programs
December 18, 2024
Press Releases
Lippes Mathias Partner Andrew M. Wilson Speaks at AILA Upstate New York Chapter Northern Border Conference
September 20, 2024
Press Releases
86 Lippes Mathias Attorneys Recognized in the 2025 Edition of "The Best Lawyers in America©"
August 15, 2024
Press Releases
Andrew M. Wilson Presented with the Community Service Award at the Minority Bar Foundation’s 40th Annual Dinner & Awards Ceremony
March 14, 2024
PRACTICE TEAMS
IMMIGRATION